MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reinventing the Polish Community: Manitoba After the 1980s

2017· article· en· W2592339860 on OpenAlex
Magdalena Blackmore

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Polish Review · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolidarityImmigrationScholarshipPoliticsGender studiesIdentity (music)SociologyPolitical scienceCharacter (mathematics)LawAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Lack of current research on Poles in Manitoba prompted the author to conduct an oral history project documenting the experiences of immigrants of the 1980s Solidarity wave. These living histories provide an insight into specific aspects of immigrant experiences, in particular this group’s political, economic, and cultural impact on existing Polish Canadian communities. This manuscript picks up where scholars of the 1980s left off, and discusses the character and role of the Solidarity immigration wave. With the benefit of more than twenty years after immigration, the author answers whether this group was able to integrate quickly into the main stream of Canadian society, as predicted in earlier scholarship, or whether they chose a more traditional pattern of constructing their cultural identity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.661
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0140.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it