MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2592372145 · doi:10.1386/crre.7.1.115_7

Publication Reviews

2016· article· en· W2592372145 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A Briggs-Goode, Simon Olding, Verity Clarkson

Bibliographic record

VenueCraft Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPavilionStudioArt historyArtButtressHistoryArchaeologyVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BE.HIVE UK Pavilion, Wolfgang Buttress (2015) Nottingham, UK: Wolfgang Buttress Studio, 128 pp., ISBN: 9780993285509, s/bk, £32.00 The Walter C. Koerner Collection of European Ceramics: A Discerning Eye, Carol E. Mayer (2014) Vancouver: Museum of Anthropology, the University of British Columbia, 172 pp., ISBN: 9781927958186, h/bk, $45.00 Crafting Design in Italy: From Post-War to Postmodernism, Catharine Rossi (2015) Manchester: Manchester University Press, 219 pp., ISBN: 9780719089404, h/bk, £70.00

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.717
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7170.681

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.594
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCraft ResearchSame topicCultural Heritage Management and PreservationFrench-language works237,207