MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2592404715 · doi:10.1007/s13142-017-0471-7

Feasibility of a telephone and web-based physical activity intervention for women shift workers

2017· article· en· W2592404715 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Behavioral Medicine · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of British ColumbiaOccupational Cancer Research CentreCanadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer ControlUniversity of TorontoCancer Care OntarioMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Cancer Society Research InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPsychological interventionIntervention (counseling)Health psychologyPhysical activityParadigm shiftMedicinePhysical therapyCross-cultural psychologyRandomized controlled trialPublic healthNursingPsychologySocial psychologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Policy:Workplaces with large numbers of shift workers may consider implementing strategies to help their workers become more active.Research:Based on feasibility and preliminary efficacy, similar interventions should be evaluated using a randomised controlled trial to determine efficacy.Practice:Targeted interventions aimed at increasing physical activity in shift workers are feasible to implement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it