MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2592523939 · doi:10.1088/1361-6544/aa60e8

Validation of the bifurcation diagram in the 2D Ohta–Kawasaki problem

2017· article· en· W2592523939 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNonlinearity · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicBlock Copolymer Self-Assembly
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsBifurcation diagramPhase diagramA priori and a posterioriDiagramParameter spaceBifurcationDomain (mathematical analysis)Kawasaki diseaseConstant (computer programming)Mathematical analysisSpace (punctuation)Applied mathematicsStatistical physicsPhase (matter)GeometryStatisticsNonlinear systemPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We develop a rigorous numerical method to compare local minimizers of the Ohta–Kawasaki functional in two dimensions. In particular, we validate the phase diagram identifying regions of parameter space where rolls are favorable, where hexagonally packed spots have lowest energy and finally where the constant mixed state does. More generally, we present a method to rigorously determine such features in problems where optimal domain sizes are not known a priori .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it