MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2592617866 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.160976

Portraying Maude Abbott

2017· article· en· W2592617866 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
James R. Wright, Richard S. Fraser, Annmarie Adams, Mary Hunter

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHistory of Medical Practice
Canadian institutionsMcGill-Queen's University PressMcGill UniversityAlberta Children's Hospital
FundersOsler Library of the History of Medicine, McGill UniversityMcGill University
KeywordsPortraitPaintingArt historyArtVisual artsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A portrait of eminent Canadian physician Maude Abbott (1869–1940) has been identified at least 66 years after it was painted by Canadian artist Mary Eastlake. This article recounts its discovery, identifies the sitter as Abbott, and compares this painting to the iconic Eastlake painting of Abbott

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.692

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0200.011
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2017
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicHistory of Medical PracticeFrench-language works237,207