Implementation of the Marrakesh Treaty for Visually Impaired Persons into the Chinese Copyright Law
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Today, advanced digital technology allows access, management, dissemination, and utilization of copyrighted information and works. In spite of such technological progress, these works are not accessible to a large number of visually impaired persons ("VIPs") mainly because there are no exceptions in national copyright laws allowing them access to copyright works at a nominal or no cost. The World Health Organization ("WHO") estimates that there are approximately 285 million VIPs worldwide and about 90 percent live in low-income settings. 1 Less than 5 percent of the books are published in accessible formats for these VIPs. 2 Among the 186 member States of the World Intellectual Property Organization ("WIPO"), in 2006, only 57 countries provided specific exceptions to facilitate access for VIPs to copyright works. The lack of an accessible format for VIPs has been dubbed as the "global book famine." As a part of the international copyright treaties administered by the WIPO, 5 it recently brought into force after ratification by Canada, the twentieth country to accede to the treaty. Given that China has been amending its Copyright Law, Chinese lawmakers are advised to incorporate provisions of the Marrakesh Treaty into the national copyright legislations prior to submitting its ratification to the WIPO.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it