MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2592644893 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1614412114

Rapid and efficient generation of oligodendrocytes from human induced pluripotent stem cells using transcription factors

2017· article· en· W2592644893 on OpenAlexaff
Marc Ehrlich, Sabah Mozafari, Michael Glatza, Laura Starost, Sergiy Velychko, Anna-Lena Hallmann, Qiao-Ling Cui, Axel Schambach, Kee-Pyo Kim, Corinne Bachelin, Antoine Marteyn, Gunnar Hargus, Radia Marie Johnson, Jack P. Antel, Jared Sterneckert, Holm Zaehres, Hans R. Schöler, Anne Baron‐Van Evercooren, Tanja Kuhlmann

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPluripotent Stem Cells Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsInduced pluripotent stem cellCell biologyBiologyStem cellHuman Induced Pluripotent Stem CellsTranscription factorComputational biologyEmbryonic stem cellGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Understanding of myelin diseases and development of new treatment options are at least partly hampered by the limited availability of human oligodendrocytes. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) may be an ideal tool to circumvent this problem; however, rapid and efficient protocols to generate oligodendrocytes from human iPSC are currently lacking. The induction of the transcription factors SOX10, OLIG2, and NKX6.2 in iPSC-derived neural progenitors accelerates oligodendroglial differentiation significantly resulting in up to 70% of O4 + oligodendrocytes within 28 d. These oligodendrocytes myelinate the CNS during development and after demyelination, and are suitable for pharmacological screens and disease modeling. The strategy presented herein will markedly facilitate the studying of human myelin diseases and the development of screening platforms for drug discovery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations262
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchFrench-language works237,207