MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2592660893 · doi:10.22489/cinc.2016.055-149

The Pressure Gradient across the Endocardium

2016· article· en· W2592660893 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputing in cardiology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndocardiumPressure gradientComputer scienceCardiologyPhysicsMechanicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mathematical formalism for the non-linear endsystolic pressure-volume relation (ESPVR) in the heart ventricles has the interesting feature that the peak active pressure generated by the myocardium (also called peak isovolumic pressure Pisom by physiologists) is included in the mathematical formalism describing the ESPVR. In this study we look at the ratio (Pisom -Pm)/Pm as an index to segregate between different clinical groups, this ratio can be calculated in a non-invasive way with the mathematical model used. Application to the left ventricle by using clinical data taken from the medical literature is given and discussed. Mathematical relations between the ejection fraction (EF) and the parameters describing the ESPVR are used in a way to get new insight into the problem of heart failure with normal or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score0.212

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it