MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2592713713 · doi:10.12957/soletras.2016.25999

Elsinore de Robert Lepage: apropriação multimidiática de Hamlet

2017· article· pt· W2592713713 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Érika Viviane Costa Vieira

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista SOLETRAS · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo trata da apropriação multimidiática do Hamlet de Shakespeare pelo dramaturgo canadense Robert Lepage em uma produção investida de imagens, música, tipografia e cenografia móvel que inovou a linguagem das adaptações de Shakespeare. A princípio, considera-se o teatro como naturalmente intermidiático, pois é capaz de incorporar todas as artes e mídias no palco. O propósito deste texto é apresentar uma análise dos elementos que se constituem como referências intermidiáticas presentes na performance. Ademais, discute ainda as razões pela qual esta peça pode ser considerada como multimidiática, uma vez que envolve processos de transposição intermidiática, combinação de mídias e de referências intermidiáticas, de acordo com a categorização de Irina Rajewsky (2012). O teatro seria, assim, multimidiático, por oferecer um lugar onde as formas artísticas (encenação, dança, música, pintura) se encontram, interagem e se integram com o cinema, a televisão, o vídeo e as novas tecnologias, criando uma profusão de sentidos (CHAPPLE & KATTENBELT, 2006). Por fim, critica-se a tecnologização da peça shakespeariana que, como o Fantasma, produz efeitos de real que distraem o público das questões mais profundas e reflexivas da peça.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista SOLETRASSame topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207