MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2592716210 · doi:10.17118/11143/10153

Les droits linguistiques au Canada

2014· article· fr· W2592716210 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Guillaume Rousseau

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de droit Université de Sherbrooke · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Language and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceSociology

Abstract

"Cet ouvrage réalisé sous la direction de Michel Bastarache et Michel Doucet étant la référence en droit linguistique canadien, la parution de la troisième édition mérite d’être soulignée [...]" Sous la direction de Michel BASTARACHE et Michel DOUCET, Les droits linguistiques au Canada, 3e édition, Cowansville, Yvon Blais, 2014.

Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.

How this classification was reachedexpand

The three-model screen

all 5,600 screened works →

All three models called this out of scope.

stratum: french · design weight: 1554.47 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: other
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Book review of a Canadian language-rights legal treatise; the object is law, not research.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre: editorial/commentary
about Canada: no
confidence: high

This is a commentary on a Canadian legal reference work, not a study of research.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre: other
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Book notice on Canadian linguistic rights law, not a study of research practice.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0110.005
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de droit Université de SherbrookeSame topicLegal Language and InterpretationFrench-language works237,207