ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC AND KINETIC FUNCTION OF REVERSE TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction This paper describes the kinetic and electromyographic contribution of principal muscles around the shoulder of a cohort of patients with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). Surgeries for RTSA significantly increased in the last five years. Initially developed to treat patients with cuff tear arthropathy and pseudoparalysis, wider indications for RTSA were described (massive non repairable rotator cuff tears, complex 4-parts fractures). Since Grammont's theory in 1985, the precise biomechanics of the RTSA has not yet been demonstrated in vivo. Clinical results of patients with RSTA are still unpredictable and vary one from another. Methods We conducted an observational prospective cohort study comparing 9 patients with RTSA (surgery more than 6 months and rehabilitation process achieved) and 8 controls with normal shoulder function adjusted for age, sex and dominance. Assessment consisted in a synchronized analysis of range of motion (ROM) and muscular activity on electromyography (EMG) with the use of 7 bipolar cutaneous electrodes, 38 reflective markers and 8 motion-recording cameras. Electromyographic results were standardized and presented in muscular activity (RMS) adjusted with maximal isometric contractions according to the direction tested. Five basic movements were evaluated (flexion, abduction, neutral external rotation, external rotation in 90° of abduction and internal rotation in 90° of abduction). Student t-test were used for comparative descriptive analysis (p<0,05). Results ROM is limited in the RSTA group (flexion 128,5 vs 152,6, p=0,04; abduction 150 vs 166, p=0,02; neutral ext rot 28.3 vs 75.6, p<0,01; 90° ext rot 26,43 vs 70,63, p<0,01, int rot 27.5 vs 49.4, p=0,01). Anterior and middle deltoid shows less muscular activation in RTSA than in controls, sustaining the deltoid potentiation described by Grammont. Posterior deltoid shows decreased activity in external rotation movements in RTSA. Upper trapezius is the main activator in all directions with an early and constant activity in RTSA (p<0,01). Latissimus dorsi demonstrates increased muscular activity in internal rotation with RTSA (p<0,01). Discussion The sequence of muscular activation in RTSA is different than in normal shoulder. Grammont's theory is confirmed with this study. The significant contribution of both the trapezius and latissimus dorsi has never been described until today. New rehabilitation protocols targeted on those muscle groups could demonstrate better and more homogenous clinical results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".