Bouwstenen voor beleid duurzame landbouw : de rol, het instrumentarium en de monitoringstools van de provincie Noord-Holland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deze nota is het resultaat van een quick scan om tot definiëring en advies van een duurzame landbouw te komen voor de provincie Noord-Holland.Deze nota focust op de sectoren waar de provincie Noord-Holland minimaal 5% van de nationale productie vertegenwoordigt.Door middel van een deskstudie en expertconsultatie zijn de belangrijkste duurzaamheidsdoelstellingen benoemd op gebied van people, planet, en profit.Vervolgens zijn de rol en instrumenten benoemd die de provincie daarbij kan inzetten en de wijze waarop verduurzaming kan worden gemonitord.This report is the result of a quick scan to define a policy for sustainable agriculture for the Dutch province of Noord-Holland.The report focuses on the agricultural sectors where the province of Noord-Holland represents at least 5% of national production.A desk study and expert consultation identifies the most important sustainability goals regarding people, planet, and profit.In addition, the role and policy instruments were identified and appointed how the province can monitor sustainable development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".