La précarité des femmes francophones de la région d’Ottawa à travers le prisme de la violence structurelle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les inégalités sociales auxquelles font face les populations francophones en Ontario semblent souvent articulées autour de leur condition linguistique minoritaire au sein de la province. Les femmes vivraient de façon plus exacerbée les difficultés liées à cette réalité en raison de la précarité de leurs conditions de vie et de l’accès limité à des services sociaux et de santé dans leur langue (Côté, Lapierre et Levesque, 2015). Cet article propose une analyse intersectionnelle de la précarité des femmes francophones de la région d’Ottawa, à travers le prisme de la violence structurelle. Il montre que leur expérience de la précarité est complexe et est construite autour de plusieurs conditions autres que celle liée à langue. Ces conditions participent également à maintenir ces femmes francophones dans une spirale de précarité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".