MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2592844946 · doi:10.9778/cmajo.20160145

The effects of catastrophic drug plan deductibles on older women's use of cardiovascular medicines: a retrospective cohort study

2017· article· en· W2592844946 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Steven G. Morgan, Emilie J. Gladstone, Deirdre Weymann, Nadia Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueCMAJ Open · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedication Adherence and Compliance
Canadian institutionsCanadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer ControlUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetrospective cohort studyMedicineCohortDrugEmergency medicineInternal medicineGerontologyPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: In recent years, some provinces have implemented income-based catastrophic drug coverage in an effort to provide universal drug coverage while limiting government liability for the escalating costs of medicines needed for an aging population. We sought to examine the effects of income-based deductibles under British Columbia's Fair PharmaCare system on older patients' use of cardiovascular medicines in 2013, 10 years after the province's policy change. METHODS: Using linked administrative databases, we studied rates of hypertension and cholesterol medication used by 2 cohorts of older, married women who had different levels of public drug subsidy based solely on their spouses' ages. We compare measures of 2013 medication use by study cohorts using statistical models that controlled for age, general health status, indicators of need for specific drug classes, ethnicity, rural residence and household income. RESULTS: Among members of our study cohorts, the odds of filling cardiovascular prescriptions in 2013 were influenced by patient age, general health status, drug-specific diagnoses, ethnicity, place of residence and household income. For women with household incomes less than $50 000 (42% of our study population), having preferential public drug coverage by way of spousal age was associated with a 15% increase in the adjusted odds of filling 1 or more prescription for hypertension treatment (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06 to 1.24) and a 13% increase in the adjusted odds of filling 1 or more prescription for cholesterol treatments (adjusted OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.21). There were no statistically significant effects on the number of days of therapy purchased per user of these cardiovascular medicines. INTERPRETATION: We have found that the level of income-based deductibles under catastrophic drug benefi t plans can affect the use of cardiovascular drug treatments, even long after deductibles are put in place. These results add to the body of evidence in support of the idea that public drug coverage design can affect access to necessary medications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCMAJ OpenSame topicMedication Adherence and ComplianceFrench-language works237,207