Ultra-broadband coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy with a dynamically power-tuned Stokes supercontinuum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The capabilities of a Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) microscopy technique that utilizes a commercially available microstructured-fibre for the generation of a Stokes supercontinuum, largely depend on the spectral characteristics of the fibre itself. Such fibres, however, have notoriously limited spectral powers and wavelength coverage, thus limiting the excitation efficiency of fibre-based CARS. We demonstrate that through the combination of time-gating and systematic power-tuning of the input pulse into a supercontinuum-generating fibre—a process we term “spectral surfing”—we are able to extend and bolster the excitation efficiencies of spectral-focusing CARS hypermicroscopy across the vibrational spectrum from ~300 cm<sup>-1</sup> to >3500 cm<sup>-1</sup>.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".