MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2592871265 · doi:10.32796/bice.2016.3079.5589

Una propuesta de reforma integral de la negociación colectiva y la legislación laboral en España

2016· article· es· W2592871265 on OpenAlexaff
Álvaro Espina

Bibliographic record

VenueBoletín Económico de ICE · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLabor Law and Work Dynamics
Canadian institutionsCegep de Sept Iles
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

tiempo que los analistas del mercado de trabajo vienen reclamando una reforma de la negociación colectiva que permita llevar a cabo la más completa descentralización (Bentolila-Jimeno, 2002), desmontar los mecanismos que colocan en posición de inferioridad absoluta a los trabajadores menos cualificados y a las pequeñas empresas (Dolado, et al., 1997), así como a las regiones menos desarrolladas (Jimeno y

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.213

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0080.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBoletín Económico de ICESame topicLabor Law and Work DynamicsFrench-language works237,207