Dynamical behavior of the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability-induced turbulent mixing under multiple shock interactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dynamical behavior of Richtmyer–Meshkov instability-induced turbulent mixing under multiple shock interactions is investigated by large-eddy simulation. After the initial shockwave–interface interaction, the transmitted wave reverberates between the accelerated interface and the end-wall of the shock tube to form a process of multiple shock interactions. The turbulent mixing zone grows in a different manner under each of the impingements. After the initial shock, it grows as a power law of time. After the reshock and the impingement of the reflected rarefaction wave, it grows with time as a different negative exponential law. When the impingement of the reflected compression wave completes, it grows approximately in a linear fashion. The statistical quantities in the turbulent mixing zone evolve with time in a similar way under multiple impingements, and after the impingement of the reflected compression wave, they all decay asymptotically. Therefore, the turbulent mixing zone behaves in a statistically self-similar pattern. Even though the impingements of different waves result in different abrupt changes of the characteristic scale parameters of mixing turbulence, as a whole, the characteristic scales present a feature of growth, and the characteristic-scale Reynolds numbers present a feature of decay. The mixing flow is continuously anisotropic, yet the anisotropy weakens gradually. Therefore the development of turbulent mixing presents a trend of isotropy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".