MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2592994787

La potestad disciplinaria de la Administración tras las Leyes 39/2015, de procedimiento administrativo común de las administraciones públicas y 40/2015, de régimen jurídico del sector público

2017· article· es· W2592994787 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alicia Esther Ortuño Rodríguez

Bibliographic record

VenueActualidad administrativa · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAdministrative Law and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrinciple of legalityPolitical scienceScope (computer science)Power (physics)DisciplineLawWelfare economicsQuarter (Canadian coin)Public administrationEconomicsGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The extension to the disciplinary power of the Public Administrations of the principles related to the sanctioning power and the sanctioning administrative procedure contained in Law 30/1992, of November 26, was expressly excluded by the aforementioned Legal Body, which has been repealed, after More than a quarter of a century of validity, from the entry into force of Laws 39 and 40/2015, of 1 October. This new dual regulation of the legal regime of public bodies and the common administrative procedure has included in its scope the exercise of the disciplinary power of the Administration with the personnel at its service, a circumstance that will oblige the competent institutions and bodies, As well as to the different legal operators to make the necessary adjustments to comply with this new regulation, starting with respect for the principle of legality in its formal and material aspects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.008
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActualidad administrativaSame topicAdministrative Law and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207