MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2593026178 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2016-0247

Influence of geometric and material characteristics on the behavior of reinforced concrete beam-column connections

2017· article· en· W2593026178 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
R Vandana

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural engineeringDuctility (Earth science)Beam (structure)DissipationJoint (building)Materials scienceYield (engineering)Compressive strengthColumn (typography)Moment (physics)Shear (geology)Connection (principal bundle)Composite materialEngineeringCreep

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The design of reinforced concrete moment-resisting frames and hence beam-column connections is of great importance in earthquake prone areas. Beam-column joints, which should be sufficiently strong to resist and sustain lateral loads, are designed on the basis of the strong-column weak-beam concept so that they undergo ductile failure. The present study describes the cyclic loading performance of six interior beam-column connection specimens designed to be seismic-resistant with varying aspect ratios, concrete compressive strengths, and beam bar yield strengths. Results indicate that joint ductility and energy dissipation capacity can be enhanced by maintaining a unit aspect ratio. Moreover, joint shear strength can be improved significantly by increasing concrete compressive strength. Beam bar yield strength is observed to influence joint ductility considerably.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicStructural Behavior of Reinforced ConcreteFrench-language works237,207