MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2593188183

Predicting high school teacher-coaches' job satisfaction

2015· article· en· W2593188183 on OpenAlexaffabout
Meredith Rocchi, Martin CamirÃ, Tanya Forneris

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Exercise, Movement, and Sport (SCAPPS refereed abstracts repository) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoachingPsychologyStructural equation modelingClosenessScale (ratio)AthletesJob satisfactionQuality (philosophy)Applied psychologyMedical educationSocial psychologyPhysical therapyMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Canada, high school athletic programs rely on the efforts and initiatives taken by high school teachers. These teacher-coaches coach sports teams outside of their regular academic responsibilities, and volunteer to ensure the success of their school's athletic program. Previous research suggests that involvement in extra-curricular activities is associated with increased job satisfaction for teachers; however, limited research has examined specific aspects of the coaching experience and how these may impact teacher-coaches' job satisfaction. The purpose of this study is to examine high school teacher-coaches' impressions of the quality of their relationships with their athletes, as well as their self-efficacy towards coaching, and how this relates to their reported teaching satisfaction. The sample was comprised of 2949 teacher-coaches, representing all of the Canadian provinces and territories, who participated in a national survey on their experiences. The results showed that teachers who reported increased commitment, closeness, and complementary with their athletes (coach-athlete relationship questionnaire) and increased self-efficacy towards coaching in terms of developing motivation, game strategy, technique, character, and physical conditioning (Coaching Efficacy Scale), reported higher teacher satisfaction (Teacher Satisfaction Scale). The model was tested using structural equation modeling and had a good fit (?2 (63) = 614.08, p < .001, SRMR = .044, CFI = .967, TLI = .959, RMSEA = .054 CI95 [.050, .058]). Alternative models were also explored and invariance testing for gender and teaching subject was also conducted. Overall, the results support that positive coach-athlete relationships, along with self-efficacy for coaching, predict increased teacher satisfaction.Acknowledgments: This research was conducted in with the assistance of an Insight Development Grant from SSHRC and Sport Canada through the Sport Participation Research Initiative.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.225
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Exercise, Movement, and Sport (SCAPPS refereed abstracts repository)Same topicMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsFrench-language works237,207