Absence of superfluidity in a quasi-one-dimensional parahydrogen fluid adsorbed inside carbon nanotubes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A recent claim of superfluid behavior of parahydrogen adsorbed inside armchair carbon nanotubes [M. Rossi and F. Ancilotto, Phys. Rev. B 94, 100502 (2016)] is disproven by means of first-principles computer simulations. Conclusive numerical evidence shows that the low-temperature equilibrium thermodynamic phase of parahydrogen adsorbed inside a $(10,10)$ armchair nanotube features a crystalline shell adsorbed on the inner surface of the tube, and a well-separated quasi-one-dimensional central column showing no evidence of possible fluid or superfluid behavior. Rather, the system is quasicrystalline and nonsuperfluid; its physical character is qualitatively identical to that observed in similar confined settings extensively studied in the past. The incorrect prediction of superfluidity stems from the erroneous use of an effective one-dimensional interaction potential that does not describe parahydrogen at the center of the nanotube.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".