MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2593361521 · doi:10.1108/sd-11-2016-0147

The strategic Chief Information Officer

2017· article· en· W2593361521 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStrategic Direction · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovation and Knowledge Management
Canadian institutionsIBM (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPyramid (geometry)OriginalityBusinessStrategic managementStrategic planningValue (mathematics)Strategic alignmentOfficerKnowledge managementProcess managementMarketingComputer scienceStrategic financial managementPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose This paper aims to discuss how Chief Information Officers (CIOs) can be the catalysts of change and play an influential role in pushing strategic transformations in their organizations. Design/methodology/approach This paper is a strategy framework pyramid with the mapped CIO’s responsibilities suggesting CIOs to move up the pyramid by spending more time in strategy analysis and development to gain the strong strategic alignment with the business. Findings CIOs need to prioritize the strategic elements of their role and build strong relationships with the front of the business to analyze and develop the organization strategy. Originality/value The paper provides valuable information in a very concise and easy-to-understand format, thus saving executives hours of browsing and reading time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it