Pulsed electric field assisted juice extraction from alfalfa
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gachovska, T.K., Ngadi, M.O. and Raghvan, G.S.V. 2006. Pulsed electric field assisted juice extraction from alfalfa. Canadian Biosystems Engineering/Le genie des biosystemes au Canada 48: 3.33 3.37. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment on alfalfa juice extraction. Alfalfa mash was produced by blending alfalfa leaves. Approximately 40 g of the mash were subjected to PEF treatment of 200 pulses at 1 Hz in two successions. Each PEF treatment was followed by pressure application at 2 and 4 MPa, respectively. White protein was separated from green protein and the mineral content of the various components of the samples was determined. PEF treatment increased extraction of juice from alfalfa mash by 38% compared to non-PEF-treated samples. Dry matter, protein content, and mineral content of PEF treated samples were significantly (P<0.05) higher than non-PEF samples. Extraction of white protein was enhanced by the PEF treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it