MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2593477479 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2017.01.182

Vision Based Navigation for Omni-directional Mobile Industrial Robot

2017· article· en· W2593477479 on OpenAlexaff
Shuai Guo, Qizhuo Diao, Fengfeng Xi

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersBeijing Municipal Science and Technology CommissionScience and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality
KeywordsComputer scienceMobile robotAerospaceWorkspaceRobotIndustrial robotMachine visionFlexibility (engineering)SimulationArtificial intelligenceComputer visionAerospace engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an Omni-directional mobile industrial robot drilling system for aerospace manufacture is introduced. Mecanum wheels are used for the robot's maneuverability in congested workspace. An industrial robot is applied to complete the drilling work for a rocket shell. A vision system is applied to enhance the precision of mobile drilling. Additional sensor systems such as laser measurement system and displacement measurement system are equipped to do the autonomous navigation and anti-collision job. To increase the flexibility and working volume of the mobile industrial robot, the autonomous mobile drilling scheme is presented. In order to fulfil the requirement for drilling precision in aerospace industry, a vision-based deviation rectification solution is developed. Some experiments are carried out to compare the influence of different calibration targets on the robot system. Numerical tests show that the rectification system is able to satisfy the accuracy of the positioning in the autonomous drilling work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProcedia Computer ScienceSame topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207