MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2593486146 · doi:10.1161/res.113.suppl_1.a152

Abstract 152: Intrinsic Vascular Tone may be Necessary for Successful Resuscitation from Experimental Cardiac Arrest

2013· article· en· W2593486146 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Ramadeen, Gerhard Dashi, Xudong Hu, Albert K.Y. Tsui, Lily Zou, Ehtesham Baig, Gregory M. T. Hare, Paul Dorian

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCoronary perfusion pressureVentricular fibrillationDefibrillationCardiologyInternal medicineAnesthesiaResuscitationCardiopulmonary resuscitationVentilation (architecture)HemodynamicsPerfusion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Survival rates from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest are often <10% despite performance of good quality CPR. We assessed the hypothesis that the effect of CPR on cardiac and brain perfusion may be dependent on factors other than thoracic compression force and ventilation. Methods: Eighty healthy Yorkshire pigs (29±3 kg) were anesthetized and underwent 2-4 minutes of untreated ventricular fibrillation (VF), followed by guideline based CPR, then defibrillation. “Survivors” were pigs in sinus rhythm with aortic systolic pressure ≥30 mmHg 30 minutes after defibrillation; all others were “non-survivors”. Hemodynamic, ventilatory and defibrillation parameters were measured and tested for association with survival. Results: Thirty four pigs survived (43%). During baseline and untreated VF, hemodynamic and blood gas parameters were not different between survivors and non-survivors. During CPR, compressions generated adequate left ventricular pressures in both groups (99±21 mmHg vs. 106±28 mmHg, survivors vs. non-survivors, P=ns). Compressions produced 28% higher peak aortic pressures in survivors than non-survivors (respectively 73±21 mmHg vs. 57±17 mmHg, P<0.005). During the decompression phase, nadir aortic pressures were 41% higher in survivors than non-survivors (respectively 24±7 mmHg vs. 17±5 mmHg, P<0.0001). Controlled manual bag ventilation during CPR resulted in significantly higher minute ventilation being delivered to survivors compared to non-survivors (4.8±2.3 L/min vs. 3.9±1.4 L/min, P<0.05). Coronary perfusion pressure, carotid blood flow, cerebral O 2 tension, and end tidal CO 2 were also higher in survivors. Conclusions: Guideline based CPR in a uniform population of pigs undergoing a structured cardiac arrest and resuscitation protocol does not produce consistent results. Intravascular pressures, intrathoracic pressure and critical organ flow correlate with survival. During cardiac arrest, more emphasis may need to be placed on vascular support rather than powerful compressions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score0.721

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation ResearchSame topicCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationFrench-language works237,207