MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2593489685 · doi:10.1139/er-2016-0075

Biological effects of xenoestrogens and the functional mechanisms via genomic and nongenomic pathways

2017· article· en· W2593489685 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhixiang Xu, Jun Liu, Lipeng Gu, Bin Huang, Xuejun Pan

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Reviews · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEstrogen and related hormone effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGPEREstrogen receptorSignal transductionBiologyReceptorNuclear receptorEstrogen receptor betaEstrogen receptor alphaEstrogenG protein-coupled receptorTranscription factorCell biologyEndocrinologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Xenoestrogens (XEs) are a class of substances that exert estrogenic effects by mimicking or blocking endogenous hormones. The sources, environmental behavior, and fate of typical XEs are described. XEs’ adverse developmental, metabolic, and immunological effects are then presented with respect to reproductive functions. The mechanisms underlying XEs’ genomic and nongenomic effects are reviewed. XEs can alter gene transcription by interfering with the functioning of conventional estrogen receptors, but they are also capable of activating multiple kinase signaling pathways that disrupt membrane-associated receptors, such as estrogen receptor alpha-36 (ERα36), estrogen receptor alpha-46 (ERα46), and G protein-coupled receptor 30 (GPR30). This review aims to provide insight into XEs’ environmental effects and to explore the prevention and treatment of their estrogenic effects based on sufficient comprehension of the mechanisms involved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental ReviewsSame topicEstrogen and related hormone effectsFrench-language works237,207