MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2593493978 · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12256

Compressed Baker's Yeast: Mapping Patents on Post‐Fermentation Processes

2017· article· en· W2593493978 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre Gélinas

Bibliographic record

VenueComprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFermentation and Sensory Analysis
Canadian institutionsCegep de Saint HyacintheAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYeastFermentationDewateringPulp and paper industryFood scienceMoistureEnvironmental scienceBiotechnologyProcess engineeringWaste managementChemistryBiologyMaterials scienceEngineeringComposite materialBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the baking industry, fresh yeast is generally available as a compressed paste containing about 70% moisture. While much literature has been published on its growth conditions in fermentation tanks, little information may be obtained on the final steps of baker's yeast production. In this review, 226 patents were found on the separation of yeast cells from spent growth media as well as its dewatering, forming, and packaging in the compressed form. The latter corresponded to 21% of 1096 unique families of patented inventions filed worldwide between 1787 and 2014 on the production of fresh baker's yeast. Patent specifications disclosed key technical information not available in scientific journals. Particularly between 1890 and 1960, highly specific equipment such as centrifugal separators, rotary vacuum filters, and extruding and cutting units were proposed. Compressed yeast may contain small amounts of processing aids, including water-absorbing agents such as starch and salt, as well as plasticizing and whitening agents. Any variation in yeast solids and moisture contents will affect its gassing power and keeping properties. Disposal and proper treatment of very large volumes of spent growth media will remain a major challenge to the baker's yeast industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.013
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food SafetySame topicFermentation and Sensory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207