Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary: The article is an expanded version of a speech given at an International Sym-posium of University Professors, in 2011. It presents the essential elements of the Chris-tian concept of sacred art, which, in a nutshell, correspond to the derivation of Christian sacred art from the faith in the incarnated Logos (Who is also the Creator of everything), with all its theoretical and practical implications. The presentation of this central aspect is preceded by a synthetic overview of the philosophical concept of beauty and art, and followed by a short consideration of the present state of sacred art in the Catholic Church and of the means to heal the present state of infirmity of Catholic sacred art. Key words: Sacred Art, Beauty, Aesthetics, Plato, Aristotle, Plotinus, Thomas Aquinas, Ratzinger, Magisterium, Patronage of the arts. Parole chiave: Arte sacra, Bellezza, Estetica, Platone, Aristotele, Plotino, Tommaso d’Aquino, Ratzinger, Magistero, Mecenatismo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".