MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Use of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Post-Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant in Patients with Philadelphia or BCR-ABL Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2016· review· en· W2593660667 on OpenAlexaff
Elena Liew, Sunita Ghosh, Lalit Saini

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineTransplantationOncologySystematic reviewPhiladelphia chromosomeMeta-analysisHematopoietic stem cell transplantationPediatricsMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: The use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+) or BCR-ABL positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has improved remission rates allowing more eligible patients to proceed on to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT). Since many patients relapse following alloHSCT, some guidelines have recommended TKIs post alloHSCT (Couban, 2014, Giebel, 2016). Although some studies have demonstrated the benefits of this strategy, others have indicated that, owing to the immunomodulatory effects of TKIs, this approach may be harmful, leading to higher relapse rates. Given this uncertainty, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies comparing the outcomes of patients post alloHSCT who did or did not receive TKIs. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ACP Journal Club, Scopus and conference abstracts focusing on the period during which TKIs were available (2000 to March 2016). Studies were included if they were retrospective or prospective cohort/randomized studies of adult patients with Ph+ or BCR-ABL+ ALL who underwent alloHSCT and received post-transplant TKIs. Studies that did not include a comparative group of patients who did not receive TKIs, duplicate studies, abstracts later published and studies of only pediatric patients were excluded from further analyses. Two reviewers with ALL expertise independently evaluated all abstracts and performed study selection. Results: The literature search identified 868 unique references, 195 of which were reviewed in detail. Seven studies, 6 retrospective and 1 prospective, comprising 1441 patients met all inclusion criteria (Table 1). Three studies contained one or more pediatric patients and four included patients beyond first complete remission including some with hematological relapse at the time of alloHSCT. All studies had a mix of donor sources including matched related, matched unrelated, mismatched related and mismatch unrelated. Pre-transplant conditioning was myeloablative in 3, reduced intensity in 1 and a combination of the two in the remaining 3 studies. TKIs were administered prophylactically (prior to hematological or minimal residual disease relapse) or pre-emptively (prior to hematological relapse). Data on the TKI used was not available in one study. Amongst the remaining 6 studies, imatinib at 400 - 600mg was the most commonly used TKI with dasatinib being used in 3 studies and nilotinib in 1 study. TKIs were initiated 0.5 - 60 months after alloHSCT and continued for 1-64 months after initiation. Overall, 346 patients received a TKI post alloHSCT while 1095 patients did not. Using a fixed effects model there was no difference in the relapse free survival (HR =0.838, 95% CI 0.678 - 1.036, p=0.102) or overall survival (HR=0.868, 95% CI 0.675 - 1.117, p=0.27) for those who received a TKI compared to those who did not. In contrast, there was a significant increase in relapse rates for those who were treated with TKI post-HSCT (HR 1.204, 95% CI 1.044 - 1.387, p=0.011). Conclusions: While there are compelling theoretical reasons to recommend TKIs post alloHSCT (Couban, 2014), this meta-analysis suggests that their use is not associated with improvements in overall survival or relapse free survival and may be associated with higher relapse rates. However, given the heterogeneous nature of the studies, these results must be viewed with caution. Nonetheless, the results are compelling and highlight the need for larger prospective controlled studies evaluating the role of TKI post alloHSCT in patients with Ph+ ALL. Disclosures Liew: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0200.036
Bibliometrics0.0080.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207