Die Toten im dritten Raum: Grabmäler als Orte der Begegnung zwischen Angehörigen verschiedener Religionen bei Wolfram von Eschenbach und Wirnt von Grafenberg
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article explores the question as to how and when tombs in medieval narrative texts can be viewed as ‘third spaces’ that are used in order to define relations between members of different religious communities. In Wolfram von Eschenbach’s ‘Parzival’ and ‘Willehalm‘ as well as in Wirnt von Grafenberg’s ‘Wigalois’ tombs and the spaces around these tombs are presented as places where Christians and ‘Heathens’ negotiate their coexistence. In ‘Parzival’, for example, Gahmuret's tomb is a memorial to a shared past that does not cause any future cooperations. In ‘Willehalm’ the burials of members of both groups demonstrate the present need to strictly distinguish between the religious spheres. In ‘Wigalois’, however, a ‘heathen’ princess’s tomb becomes a place in which new alliances can be formed. It can thus be considered a ‘third space’ – if only temporarily. Moreover, it illustrates how a narrative text about the encounter between religious and worldly semiotic systems integrates Christian imperatives but also uses them in order to create new norms of courtly existence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it