MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2593776441 · doi:10.1182/blood.v110.11.472.472

Efficacy and Safety of Dasatinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Blast Phase Whose Disease Is Resistant or Intolerant to Imatinib: 2-Year Follow-Up Data from the START Program.

2007· article· en· W2593776441 on OpenAlexaff
Carlo Gambacorti, Jörge E. Cortes, Dong‐Wook Kim, Hervé Dombret, Chao Zhu, Jan Van Tornout, Felix T. Garzon, Michele Baccarani

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDasatinibImatinibMedicineInternal medicineImatinib mesylateTransplantationGastroenterologyMyeloid leukemiaOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The prognosis for patients with myeloid-blast (MB) or lymphoid-blast (LB) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is poor, with an estimated survival from onset of blast crisis of approximately 3 months. Dasatinib (SPRYCEL®) is a novel inhibitor of BCR-ABL and SRC-family kinases, that has proven to be effective (in terms of complete hematologic and cytogenetic response) for patients with MB- or LB-CML whose disease is either resistant or intolerant to imatinib. Patients were enrolled to the corresponding START studies between January and June 2005, and dasatinib 70 mg BID was administered to 109 patients with MB-CML and 48 patients with LB-CML. All patients had previously failed treatment with imatinib - 90% of whom were resistant to imatinib. Here we present an update with a minimum follow-up of 12 mo. Of the 157 patients, 56% were male and median age was 54 years (range 17–81). Median time from CML diagnosis was 44 mo (range 2–216). Prior therapy included imatinib >600 mg/d in 50% of patients, treatment with imatinib for >3 years in 36%, and stem-cell transplantation in 19%. At baseline, 57% had WBC <20,000/mm3, 69% had platelets <100,000/mm3, and 18% had extramedullary disease outside of the spleen. Major hematologic responses (MaHRs) were induced in 34% of patients with MB-CML (imatinib-resistant 35%, -intolerant 20%) and 35% of LB-CML patients (imatinib-resistant 36%, -intolerant 33%). Major cytogenetic responses (MCyRs) were attained in 33% of patients with MB-CML (imatinib-resistant 34%, -intolerant 20%) and 52% of LB-CML patients (imatinib-resistant 50%, -intolerant 67%), while complete cytogenetic responses (CCyRs) were achieved in 26% (imatinib-resistant 26%, -intolerant 20%) and 46% of patients (imatinib-resistant 43%, -intolerant 67%), respectively. Median progression-free survival was 6.7 mo (MB-CML) and 3.0 mo (LB-CML) while median overall survival was 11.8 mo and 5.3 mo, respectively. Dasatinib was generally well tolerated in this poor prognosis population. Fluid retention events were observed more frequently in the MB-CML cohort, with all grade pleural effusion occurring in 36% and 13% of MB and LB patients, respectively (grade 3–4 - 15% and 6%). Other non-hematologic side effects were primarily grade 1–2. Cytopenias were noted for the majority of patients, and were manageable; grade 3–4 febrile neutropenia was recorded in 8% of patients. Dasatinib doses were reduced in 32% of patients and interrupted in 59%, most typically as a result of non-hematologic toxicities. Doses were escalated in 44% of patients. The median duration of therapy was 3.4 mo (0.03–18) for all patients and 14 mo (6–18) for patients still receiving treatment. Long-term data confirm that dasatinib is highly active, producing rapid and clinically meaningful responses in this poor prognosis patient population. Updated analyses corresponding to a minimum follow-up of 2 years on all patients will be presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207