MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2593977078 · doi:10.1002/ad.2160

Cultivating the ‘In‐Between’: Humanising the Modern Healthcare Experience

2017· article· en· W2593977078 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
T. D. Montgomery

Bibliographic record

VenueArchitectural Design · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Healthcare and Medical Tourism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCITESPorchSoulHealth careAestheticsBalance (ability)Visual artsSociologyHistoryArtMedicineLawPolitical scienceArchaeologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Corridors and waiting rooms are as important to the patient experience as clinical spaces. Yet in modernist hospitals they tend to be isolating, soul‐destroying places to be. Since the 1970s, Toronto‐based Montgomery Sisam Architects have been redressing the balance, enhancing patient wellbeing and restoring a connection to the great outdoors by focusing on the porch, the gallery and the courtyard. Terry Montgomery , one of the firm's cofounders, here cites their inspirations, from traditional towns and centuries‐old hospitals to modern urban theorists, and presents some of their recent buildings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.046
Scholarly communication0.0110.007
Open science0.0010.010
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.290
GPT teacher head0.508
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchitectural DesignSame topicGlobal Healthcare and Medical TourismFrench-language works237,207