MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2594034975 · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05166

Molecular Structure of Lactoferrin Influences the Thermal Resistance of Lactococcal Phages

2017· article· en· W2594034975 on OpenAlexafffund
Hany Geagea, Ahmed Gomaa, Gabriel Remondetto, Sylvain Moineau, Muriel Subirade

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalAgropur cooperative
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLactoferrinChemistryCircular dichroismBacteriophageBacteriaLactic acidWhey proteinThermal stabilityFood scienceFourier transform infrared spectroscopyMicrobiologyBiochemistryBiophysicsChemical engineeringBiologyOrganic chemistryEscherichia coli

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The protective effect of whey proteins on phages of lactic acid bacteria during heat treatment limits the recycling of whey proteins into cheese. To investigate this protective effect, we used lactoferrin (LF) as a whey protein model as a result of its unique physicochemical properties and its antiviral activity. First, the thermal inactivation of lactococcal thermoresistant virulent phage P1532 was measured in LF at 95 °C and under different pH values. Phage inactivation results revealed a strong protective effect of LF on P1532 phage at pH 5 but none at pH 7. The structural conformational changes of LF were then monitored by Fourier transform infrared and circular dichroism spectroscopies. Spectroscopic analysis showed that LF was unfolded after heating at pH 7, while it preserved its tertiary and secondary structures when heated at pH 5. There is a direct correlation between the thermal stability of LF and its ability to protect P1532 phage from heat treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistrySame topicBacteriophages and microbial interactionsFrench-language works237,207