De la narration à la scène : l’amitié à l’épreuve du malheur dans Marc-Antoine et Bradamante de Robert Garnier
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Garnier met en scene plusieurs personnages d’amis. Ils lui sont inspires par des recits epiques ou historiques, ou l’amitie contribue peu ou prou au mouvement dramatique de la narration. Il confere ainsi a une figure d’arriere-plan un veritable role theâtral, ou transpose sur scene une situation dramatique deja existante dans le texte-source : dilemme, reconnaissance, suicide. Confrontes au malheur, les personnages prouvent leur devouement aux affliges en leur apportant leur soutien moral, ou une aide effective qui fait rebondir l’action. Ces scenes topiques comportent parfois elles-memes des recits, qui eclairent le public sur la naissance de l’amitie, les experiences, les sentiments et les valeurs qui la fondent : admiration pour le courage, la loyaute de l’ami, gratitude pour son esprit de sacrifice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".