MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

On the period map for prime Fano threefolds of degree 10

2011· article· en· W2594401973 on OpenAlexaff
Olivier Debarre, Atanas Iliev, Laurent Manivel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Algebraic Geometry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmAnnotationType (biology)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceMathematicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study, after Logachev, the geometry of smooth complex Fano threefolds X X with Picard number 1 1 , index 1 1 , and degree 10 10 , and their period map to the moduli space of 10-dimensional principally polarized abelian varieties. We prove that a general such X X has no nontrival automorphisms. By a simple deformation argument and a parameter count, we show that X X is not birational to a quartic double solid, disproving a conjecture of Tyurin. Through a detailed study of the variety of conics contained in X X , a smooth projective irreducible surface of general type with globally generated cotangent bundle, we construct two smooth projective two-dimensional components of the fiber of the period map through a general X X : one is isomorphic to the variety of conics in X X , modulo an involution, another is birationally isomorphic to a moduli space of semistable rank- 2 2 torsion-free sheaves on X X , modulo an involution. The threefolds corresponding to points of these components are obtained from X X via conic and line (birational) transformations. The general fiber of the period map is the disjoint union of an even number of smooth projective surfaces of this type.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Algebraic GeometrySame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207