MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Subcutaneous (SQ) Bortezomib (BTZ) in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): Retrospective, Observational Study of Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in US Community Oncology Practices

2014· article· en· W2594418048 on OpenAlexaff
Alan P Skarbnik, Esprit Ma, Marie‐Hélène Lafeuille, Jonathan Fortier, Tatyana Feldman, Mei Sheng Duh, Yvette Ng, Helgi van de Velde, Edward Dow, Liviu Niculescu, Vijayveer Bonthapally, André Goy

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsGroup for Research in Decision Analysis
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineMantle cell lymphomaBortezomibAdverse effectOncologyNeutropeniaPhases of clinical researchDiscontinuationRituximabCarfilzomibSurgeryClinical trialMultiple myelomaLymphomaChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The outcome of MCL has improved thanks to the use of dose-intensive strategies ± ASCT and novel therapies in the relapsed/refractory setting. IV BTZ was the first agent approved by the FDA in relapsed/refractory MCL, in 2006, based on the phase 2 PINNACLE study (Fisher et al, J Clin Oncol 2006); overall response rate (ORR) was 32%, with 8% CR/CRu, median TTP was 6.7 mos, PFS was 6.5 mos, time to next therapy (TTNT) was 7.4 mos, and OS was 23.5 mos. Common grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) included 13% peripheral neuropathy (PN) and 12% fatigue. Recently, the phase 3 LYM-3002 study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of IV BTZ plus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone vs R-CHOP in frontline MCL (Cavalli et al, ASCO 2014; median PFS 24.7 vs 14.4 mos). SQ BTZ was FDA approved in January 2012 based on the phase 3 MMY-3021 trial, which showed non-inferior efficacy (ORR after 4 cycles) and an improved systemic safety profile (including a significant reduction in PN) with SQ vs IV BTZ in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) (Moreau et al, Lancet Oncol 2011). While there are a number of ongoing SQ BTZ clinical studies in MCL, there are limited published data in relapsed MCL in the real-world clinical setting. This retrospective, observational study evaluated treatment patterns and outcomes with SQ BTZ in relapsed MCL pts in US community oncology practices. Methods Data on pts diagnosed with MCL aged ≥18 yrs who had received at least 1 prior line of therapy and who subsequently received ≥1 SQ BTZ dose between April 2006 and April 2014, either as a single agent or in combination, were extracted from the Altos OncoEMR™ oncology-specific electronic medical records database and medical charts. Treatment patterns, including treatment regimens and exposure, and outcomes, including ORR, TTP, PFS, TTNT, OS, and AEs, were descriptively analyzed. Results A total of 1,281 pts diagnosed with MCL were identified in the database; 134 had received ≥1 BTZ dose, including 53 relapsed MCL pts with ≥1 SQ BTZ dose. Among these 53 pts (see Table), median treatment duration was 2.4 mos (median 4 21-day-equivalent cycles); 28 received SQ BTZ as a single agent, and 25 received it in combination; combination regimens included 13 with rituximab (R), 3 with R+bendamustine, 3 with dexamethasone (dex), 2 with R+dex, and 1 with idelalisib, R+cyclophosphamide, and R+lenalidomide+dex (1 regimen unknown). Median time from MCL diagnosis was 2.1 yrs; pts had received a median of 2 lines of prior therapy (1 for pts receiving single-agent BTZ, 2 for those receiving SQ BTZ in combination), including 9% with prior transplant and 17% with prior IV BTZ treatment as induction; 40% of pts were refractory to their last prior therapy. ORR (CR+PR) was 22%, including 17% CR (1 CR in 7 evaluable pts with prior IV BTZ). Median observation period was 5.3 mos; at data cut-off, 45% of pts had progressed, 38% had started a new line of therapy, and 42% had died. Median PFS was 4.7 mos (IQR: 1.9–11.3); median OS was 11.3 mos (IQR: 5.1–not reached [NR]). The most common AEs included 42% fatigue, 36% anemia, 25% nausea, 25% neutropenia, 21% thrombocytopenia, and 21% neuropathy; 9%/8%/4% reported local redness/rash/tenderness. Grade ≥3 AEs included 1 pt (2%) each with CHF (pt with baseline arrhythmia), diarrhea, fatigue, neuropathy, rash, and vomiting. Conclusions These findings indicate that SQ BTZ, alone or in combination, was active and generally well tolerated in relapsed MCL. In the context of findings from PINNACLE, these data appear consistent with the non-inferior efficacy and improved safety profile of SQ BTZ in MM, notably the low rate of neuropathy (21%; 2% grade ≥3). As data mature, additional analyses will further evaluate treatment outcomes. Table AllN=53 Single agentn=28 Combinationn=25 Median age, yrs 70.8 75.2 68.6 Age ≥75 yrs, n (%) 19 (36) 14 (50) 5 (20) Male, n (%) 37 (70) 20 (71) 17 (68) Baseline neuropathy, n (%) 7 (13) 3 (11) 4 (16) Median treatment duration, mos 2.4 1.4 2.4 ORR, n/N evaluable (%) 8/36 (22) 3/22 (14) 5/14 (36) CR, n/N evaluable (%) 6/36 (17) 2/22 (9) 4/14 (29) Stable disease, n/N evaluable (%) 5/36 (14) 4/22 (18) 1/14 (7) TTP, mos* 5.3 (2.6–NR) 4.1 (1.4–NR) 5.1 (3.2–NR) PFS, mos* 4.7 (1.9–11.3) 3.8 (1.0–11.3) 5.1 (3.2–15.2) TTNT, mos* 7.9 (5.1–NR) 10.3 (3.8–10.3) 6.3 (5.1–NR) OS, mos* 11.3 (5.1–NR) 9.1 (5.7–NR) 13.4 (4.9–NR) Any AE, n (%) 42 (79) 21 (75) 21 (84) Any grade ≥3 AE, n (%) 6 (11) 3 (11) 3 (12) Any / grade ≥3 neuropathy, n (%) 11 (21) / 1 (2) 6 (21) / 0 5 (20) / 1 (4) *Median (IQR) Disclosures Ma: Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Employment. Lafeuille:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Research Funding. Fortier:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Research Funding. Feldman:Spectrum: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Duh:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Research Funding. Ng:Janssen Global Services, LLC.: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. van de Velde:Janssen Research & Development: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. Dow:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Employment; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Equity Ownership. Niculescu:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Employment; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Equity Ownership; Pfizer: Equity Ownership. Bonthapally:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Employment; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Equity Ownership. Goy:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→