MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2594566058 · doi:10.21810/strm.v9i1.225

Public Event: Visual and Sonic Imaginations: Montage as Illusion

2017· article· en· W2594566058 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Christine Rose Ackerley

Bibliographic record

VenueStream Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConversationEthnographyVisual artsIllusionEvent (particle physics)Visual anthropologyMedia studiesSociologyHistoryAnthropologyArt historyAestheticsArtPsychologyCommunicationCognitive psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On January 19th, 2017, Alexandrine Boudreault-Fournier from Anthropology, University of Victoria in conversation with Vincent Andrisani from the School of Communications, SFU will present CONVERSATIONS WITH UNUSUAL SUSPECTS on the sensorial, art and ethnography: A new seminar series by the Centre for Imaginative Ethnography (CIE) & the Institute for Performance Studies (IPS), in HC room 7000 at 3:00-5:30 pm. Please see the attached poster for details.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.008
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStream Interdisciplinary Journal of CommunicationSame topicCultural Heritage Management and PreservationFrench-language works237,207