MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2594576089

O Conselho do Ártico

2015· article· pt· W2594576089 on OpenAlex
Armando Marques Guedes

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePortuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGeography and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O Conselho do Ártico (doravante, AC) é um fórum intergovernamental que nasceu focado em questões de proteção do meio ambiente naquela região e ancorado em temas ligados à proteção de formas sustentáveis de desenvolvimento. Inclui oito “Estados membros” que dele foram fundadores, e que em 1991 assinaram a Estratégia Ártica de Proteção do Meio: Canadá, Dinamarca, Finlândia, Islândia, Noruega, Rússia, Suécia e EUA. Juntam-se- -lhes seis “grupos indígenas” da região ártica, com estatuto de “participantes permanentes”, organizados num Secretariado de Grupos Indígenas (IPS): a Associação Internacional Aleuta (AIA), o Conselho Atabasco do Ártico (AAC), o Conselho Internacional Gwich’in (GIC), o Conselho Inuit Circumpolar (ICC), a Associação Russa dos Povos Indígenas do Norte (RAIPON), e o Conselho Saami (SC).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0030.013
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it