Bibliographic record
Abstract
Par le biais d’une série de propositions modestes, cet article cherche à aller au-delà de deux courants historiographiques liés à l’étude de la communauté politique québécoise qui occultent la place des Premières Nations au sein du récit historique national. L’auteur suggère des analyses du « fait indien » qui feraient mieux dialoguer les historiographies plus ou moins étanches portant sur le Québec, d’une part, et sur sa population autochtone, de l’autre. En insistant sur des problèmes méthodologiques, souvent émergeant directement des projets politiques contemporains, ainsi que sur différentes manières possibles de dépasser ces derniers, l’objectif de ce texte est d’encourager un renouveau de la recherche en histoire autochtone au Québec (recherche qui est, par ailleurs, déjà en cours), non pas pour assimiler cette dernière au récit historique national, mais pour assurer que ces deux historiographies distinctes mais liées interagissent et s’inspirent mutuellement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".