Hierarchical Self‐Assembly of Dopamine into Patterned Structures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been demonstrated that dopamine can undergo oxidation and complicated self‐reaction in aqueous solution to form so‐called polydopamine (PDA). In this paper, for the first time, the hierarchical self‐assembly of dopamine into surface patterned structures is described. PDA nanoaggregates are first prepared assisted by ethylenediamine, based on the covalent self‐polymerization and noncovalent self‐assembly. The surface fractal patterns are further created and modulated by the dynamic self‐assembly of PDA nanoaggregates to develop more macroscopic ordered structure of PDA. Various surface patterns of PDA aggregates are successfully obtained by evaporative dewetting method. The effects of solution pH, type of inorganic salts, and temperature on the morphology of surface pattern are investigated. Mineralization or metal deposition is used to keep the pattern fixed. The surface patterning strategy reported here is applicable to a broad range of materials, which allows the developments of materials with controllable patterned structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".