The Relationship between Working Capital Management, Financial Constraints and Performance of Listed Companies in Tehran Stock Exchange
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between working capital management, financial constraints and performance of listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. To verify this financial information from 148companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange during the period 2009- 2013 were studied. Information required extracted from Rah Avard Novin 3 software, and thensummarized, classified, and calculated by Microsoft Excel, and finally through Eviews 8 and Stata 12 software were analyzed. According to the statistical procedures conducted in 95/0 reliability, the assumptions are tested. methods of the study are inductive reasoning and in terms of time are cross-sectional and in terms of relationship between variables is correlation. the results showed that ROA has a negative impact on working capital management. While financial constraints affect the relationship between working capital management and return on assets. better management of working capital can improve companies’ performance. On the other hand, effect of working capital on companies’ performance would be increased when facing financial constraint.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it