MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2594709205 · doi:10.1016/j.breast.2017.02.012

Secondary gastric cancer malignancies following a breast cancer diagnosis: A population-based analysis

2017· article· en· W2594709205 on OpenAlexaff
Alyson Mahar, Daniel J. Kagedan, Julie Hallet, Natalie G. Coburn

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Breast · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook HospitalHealth Sciences CentreQueen's UniversitySunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerCancerOncologyInternal medicinePopulationEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the population-risk of developing gastric cancer (GC) following breast cancer (BC). METHODS: GC incidence following a ductal or lobular BC were separately compared to incidence in the general United States population using SEER data. RESULTS: GC rates were similar to the general population for ductal BC. Women aged 35-75 with lobular BC had a significantly higher incidence of GC; women aged 40-44 had the highest risk. CONCLUSION: The risk of secondary GC is high among young women diagnosed with lobular BC. More studies investigating the etiology and prevalence of familial GC syndromes at the population-level are needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe BreastSame topicMultiple and Secondary Primary CancersFrench-language works237,207