MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Polarization Transfer in the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>He</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">H</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>Reaction at<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8</mml:mn></mml:math>and<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mn>1.3</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math>

2010· article· lv· W2594710908 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2010
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's UniversityDalhousie University
FundersThomas Jefferson National Accelerator FacilityU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsPolarization (electrochemistry)ProtonAtomic physicsNuclear physicsPhysical chemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proton recoil polarization was measured in the quasielastic $^{4}\mathrm{He}(\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{e},{e}^{\ensuremath{'}}\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{p})^{3}\mathrm{H}$ reaction at ${Q}^{2}=0.8$ and $1.3\text{ }\text{ }(\mathrm{GeV}/c{)}^{2}$ with unprecedented precision. The polarization-transfer coefficients are found to differ from those of the $^{1}\mathrm{H}(\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{e},{e}^{\ensuremath{'}}\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{p})$ reaction, contradicting a relativistic distorted-wave approximation and favoring either the inclusion of medium-modified proton form factors predicted by the quark-meson coupling model or a spin-dependent charge-exchange final-state interaction. For the first time, the polarization-transfer ratio is studied as a function of the virtuality of the proton.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.673
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0100.018
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.017
Bibliometrics0.0050.010
Science and technology studies0.0140.013
Scholarly communication0.0150.014
Open science0.0190.015
Research integrity0.0170.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0940.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it