MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2594730346

A decomposition method using FEM for long waveguides

2006· article· en· W2594730346 on OpenAlexaff
K. Y. Sze, Subhash C. Kashyap

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Symposium on Antenna Technology and Applied Electromagnetics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite element methodPhysical opticsMethod of moments (probability theory)Computational electromagneticsGeometrical opticsDecompositionDiffractionUniform theory of diffractionIntegral equationDecomposition method (queueing theory)ElectromagneticsComputer scienceMathematical analysisApplied mathematicsMathematicsOpticsPhysicsElectromagnetic fieldElectronic engineeringEngineeringStructural engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The analysis of an electrically large, perfectly electric conducting (PEC) structure is typically performed using asymptotic electromagnetic formulations, such as, geometric optics (GO), physical optics (PO) and the Uniform Theory of Diffraction (UTD). Due to their less accurate solutions in some problems compared to full-wave techniques, such as, the Method of Moments (MoM) and the Finite Element Method (FEM), full-wave solutions are sometimes preferred, especially, if computational limitations for large problems can be overcome. Therefore, the concept of scatterer decomposition technique for the EM analysis of these structures was introduced by Kinzel [1] more than thirty years ago, and was later expanded to different decomposition methods by many others. These proposed methods were mostly implemented based on the Integral Equation (IE) formulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.510
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Symposium on Antenna Technology and Applied ElectromagneticsSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207