MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2594824330 · doi:10.4000/ifha.8600

Detlef Lehnert (dir.), SPD und Parlamentarismus. Entwicklungslinien und Problemfelder 1871-1990

2017· article· de· W2594824330 on OpenAlexaff
Étienne Dubslaff

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en Allemagne · 2017
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunism, Protests, Social Movements
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À la question rhétorique de Jacques le Goff « Faut-il vraiment couper l’Histoire en tranches ? », les auteurs de SPD und Parlamentarismus. Entwicklungslinien und Problemfelder 1871-1990 réunis autour de Detlef Lehnert répondent par l’affirmative. En effet, les dix articles qui composent cette monographie retracent par « tranches » de décennie les évolutions sociales-démocrates vis-à-vis de la théorie et de la pratique parlementaires en Allemagne. Cette démarche, étonnante de prime abord, a le...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en AllemagneSame topicCommunism, Protests, Social MovementsFrench-language works237,207