Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This essay examines the poetic performances of Rocío Cerón, Melisa Machado and Lía Colombino at the Poetry Parnassus, a non-competitive cultural event planned as part of the 2012 London Olympics. They were chosen to represent Mexico, Uruguay and Paraguay, three of the Latin American nations that competed athletically at the 2012 event. After describing this competition, the essay goes on to explore the performative and communicative strategies used by each of these three poets and it does so by relying on the notion of poesía expandida. The final three sections contain an analysis of the brief selections each of the poets performed. Despite marked differences between these poets, the essay argues that they share an interest in dismantling postcolonial notions of subjectivity, and that they do so by highlighting the importance of the body in the performance of their poetry, and the importance of the prehistoric origins of their respective selves in their poetic imagery. Only Cerón addresses her relationship with her national heritage directly in the poem she chose to perform; but the other two poets’ marked preoccupation with their animal, pre-cultural bodies reveals a generalized uncertainty, or discomfort, towards the postcolonial histories they have inherited.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".