MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2594900602 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2017.2679717

Planar Transformers With Near-Zero Common-Mode Noise for Flyback and Forward Converters

2017· article· en· W2594900602 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLeakage inductanceCapacitanceConvertersInductanceTransformerGalvanic isolationFlyback transformerParasitic capacitanceElectronic engineeringEMILeakage (economics)Equivalent series inductanceElectrical engineeringElectromagnetic interferenceTopology (electrical circuits)EngineeringVoltagePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Flyback and forward converters are two commonly used topologies for isolated low-power applications. These converters are simple and cost effective and provide galvanic isolation, which make them desirable for low-power levels. In order to enhance the performance of these converters, planar transformers (PTs) can be used that feature lower height, considerably lower leakage inductance, excellent thermal characteristics, and repeatability. Selecting a proper winding arrangement for a PT is a significant challenge, in particular given the large capacitances involved in flat structures. While interleaved structures significantly reduce the ac resistance and leakage inductance of PTs, they also lead to very large interwinding capacitance, which produces significant levels of undesired common-mode (CM) noise that causes EMI problems. Reducing interwinding capacitance by using noninterleaved structures is not an ideal solution to the CM noise problem because of its side effects. Instead, this paper tackles the problem by proposing the concept of paired layers. According to this concept, there are layers in the primary and secondary sides that have the same dv/dt, and therefore, their overlapping does not generate CM noise. These layers can be used to design highly interleaved structures that not only have very low ac resistance and leakage inductance, but also generate almost zero CM noise, although they may have a very large interwinding capacitance. In addition, a detailed parasitic capacitance model of PTs is proposed, which analytically validates the proposed concept and method. The experimental results show that the proposed PTs not only have very low ac resistance and leakage inductance, but also generate extremely low levels of CM noise. Considering that the proposed PT has interwinding capacitance equal to 700 pF, it is very interesting to see that it generates significantly less CM noise than does a traditional wire-wound transformer that has only 10-pF parasitic capacitance. Therefore, the proposed method gives designers the opportunity to minimize ac resistance and leakage inductance by using highly interleaved structures, without having to worry about CM noise caused by large interwinding capacitance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it