MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2594913267 · doi:10.24358/bud-arch_16_152_04

Analiza fazy przygotowawczej rozbiórki obiektu budowlanego

2016· article· pl· W2594913267 on OpenAlexaff
Anna Sobotka, Joanna Sagan

Bibliographic record

VenueBudownictwo i Architektura · 2016
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLocal Governance and Planning
Canadian institutionsGeomechanica (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rozbiórka może stanowić samodzielne przedsięwzięcie budowlane lub jego etap początkowy. Jak każde przedsięwzięcie składa się z wielu etapów – w tym zaplanowania i przygotowania robót rozbiórkowych. W artykule przeprowadzono analizę działań w fazie przygotowawczej rozbiórki, bazując na wymaganiach aktów prawnych, w tym Prawa budowlanego.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBudownictwo i ArchitekturaSame topicLocal Governance and PlanningFrench-language works237,207