MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595033896 · doi:10.1093/biolreprod/78.s1.224a

The Dynamics of Scavenger Receptor BI Expression During Luteinization.

2008· article· en· W2595033896 on OpenAlexaff
Mário Binelli, Leonor Miranda Jiménez, Vickie Roussel, Bruce D. Murphy

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEstrogen and related hormone effects
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvulationCorpus luteumEndocrinologyInternal medicineEstrous cycleBiologyOvarian follicleFollicular phaseOvaryScavenger receptorAndrologyCholesterolHormoneLipoprotein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During luteinization, bulk cholesterol uptake to ovarian cells from blood high-density lipoproteins (HDL) is achieved by Scavenger Receptor BI (SR-BI). This is believed to be the major source of substrate for steroidogenesis. In the pig, we have shown weak expression of SR-BI in granulosa cells prior to ovulation, while robust in the corpus luteum (CL), where the protein localizes to the plasma membrane. Little is known about other species, indeed mice with SR-BI null mutation display estrous cycles and form CLs. We studied the expression of SR-BI during estrous cycle, the effects of uncoupling of ovulation and luteinization and the ovarian consequences of SR-BI knockout. Ovarian morphology was examined by light microscopy in HE-stained sections, SR-BI protein expression by immunofluorescence and progesterone determined by RIA. In Experiment 1, ovaries were collected from mature female WT mice at each stage of the estrous cycle (n=3 per stage). Expression of SR-BI was weak and diffuse in granulosa cells of developing follicles but became strong and localized to the cell membrane in CLs. In Experiment 2, follicular development was induced in immature female mice with PMSG and hCG. Animals received, 6 mg/kg of meloxicam (a cyclooxygenase inhibitor; MEL; n=3) or 10 mg of mifepristone (a progesterone receptor antagonist; RU; n=3) to block ovulation or vehicle only (n=3) and ovaries were collected 24 h after the hCG injection. Ovaries of animals treated with MEL or RU showed non-ovulated follicles, containing entrapped oocytes in unexpanded cumulus complexes. Membrane SR-BI expression was present throughout, but most intensely in the peripheral regions of the unruptured follicles. In Experiment 3, follicular development of mature WT and SR-BI-/- mice was stimulated by PMSG and hCG and animals were divided to receive vehicle or a combination of 20 mg/kg of mevinolin (an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor; MEV) and 100 mg/kg of chloroquinone (an inhibitor of lysosomal processing of LDL; CHLORO) in a 2x2 factorial design (n=3 per group). At 18 h after hCG injection, approximately 6 h after expected ovulation, ovaries from SR-BI-/- mice presented small, luteal-like structures and large follicles with a thick, luteal-like layer of theca cells. Ovaries from MEV-CHLORO-treated, SR-BI-/- mice also displayed follicular cysts with blood filled cavities. Plasma progesterone concentrations were decreased in SR-BI-/- mice and further decreased by MEV-CHLORO treatment. It was concluded that (1) membrane expression of SR-BI increases in response to luteinization, (2) this event is not dependent on ovulation, (3) CL can be formed in the absence of SR-BI and (4) blocking cholesterol de novo synthesis and uptake from LDL and HDL sources leads to the formation of follicular cysts and reduces, but does not impair, ovarian steroidogenesis. Supported by CIHR grant FRN 11018 to BDM. MB is on leave from University of São Paulo and is supported by FAPESP (grant 06/52960-4).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of ReproductionSame topicEstrogen and related hormone effectsFrench-language works237,207