MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595044018 · doi:10.5006/c2011-11263

Development of a Test Protocol for the Evaluation of Underdeposit Corrosion Inhibitors in Large Diameter Crude Oil Pipelines

2011· article· en· W2595044018 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Properties and Failure Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsAlberta Innovates
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorrosionPipeline transportPetroleum engineeringProtocol (science)PetroleumTest (biology)Crude oilMaterials scienceComputer scienceMetallurgyEnvironmental scienceEngineeringGeologyMedicineEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Pipelines carrying heavy crude oil may be subject to corrosion caused by deposition of sediments, a sludge containing oil, water, and bacteria in a particulate matrix. A standard testing protocol was developed with the participation of five inhibitor vendors. The test protocol includes inhibitor evaluations based on (1) Filming Effectiveness, (2) Partitioning Studies, (3) Sludge Corrosivity and Inhibitor Tests, and (4) Bacterial Kill Studies. The results of the different tests and the relevance of each test with regard to the application are discussed. A successful bacterial kill test approach was established. Initial exposure tests of coupons covered with inhibited sludge in oil are most representative of the pipeline environment, but results were variable. Improvements to the test procedure are presented and explored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it